hitman wrote:I disagree. Some of the best magicians have been deeply religious. It added to their practice, didn't take away from it. And vice versa, I would think. A magician of the Middle Ages wouldn't have made a big deal of seperating the two, except in speech so as to avoid execution or arrest. He would have seen it as using a certain set of techniques in order to get in contact with some of the beings that his religion talks about.
And if we read the grimoires, the authors themselves show a moralistic idea of good and bad at times.
In modern times it might be vogue to say "there is no good and bad" but that's dumb. People might disagree as what constitutes good and bad action,but that doesn't mean that we should shout down those who have the balls to have beliefs and talk about them.
I mean c'mon, this is like throwing a fit everytime somebody brings up karma. People today get so caught up in political correctness and the worship of themselves that they forget that people do not make the rules. Gravity, inertia, genetic predisposition to avoid certain behaviors, and many other things were all around way before humans.Menxeperset wrote:Grab wrote:define good. define bad. no wait, please don't, it's a random and futile exercise.
Agreed. Although sometimes it may be unavoidable, one always appreciates it when posts try to avoid moving from the mystical/magical into the devotional/religious.
No, no, I agree with what you're saying and, nominally, with the OP. What I disagree with is, on this forum, moving the magical into the religious when it is not absolutely necessary. I am a big proponent of freedom of belief. I am also very fond of this being a forum dedicated to magical technique. Sometimes, given that such techniques are intrinsically connected with religious tradition, it's unavoidable. But it rubs me the wrong way when people begin to claim that their religion is the source of their magic and that is why they are oh-so-much-more-powerful.
In defense of Grab's original comment, for the purposes of evocation (and most other magical methodologies), the definition of good, bad, and god may remain subjective. And there will still be enough common ground for us to talk about discarnate entities, approaches, and even where these things connect to magico-religious paradigms.
Just keep your god zipped up so I don't have to whip mine out, too, and then we wind up having a holy pissing contest.
Mxs